|
|||||||||||||||
|
Seismic hazards analysis Seismic-hazards analysis involves quantifying potential shaking from future earthquakes in minute detail. This sort of analysis is called probabilistic. It’s risk analysis. It brings together findings from geologists in trenches, seismologists, soil samples from the site, and ordinary how-far-away-are-those-faults geometry. Software is required. We like using EZ-FriskTM software by Risk Engineering, Inc. Below are just a few examples of our work. |
||||||||||||||
Elementary schools ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Groffie1 has evaluated seismic hazards and geologic conditions at several elementary schools in the Bay area and Santa Cruz area. Generally, we analyze a site using subsurface data (drilling), regional geology data, and software aids, but additional techniques may come into play. We probabilistically develop design-level potential seismic acceleration values. Occasionally, special issues are involved, including potential liquefaction. At two sites, we evaluated the potential for tsunami impacts. At another, we evaluated the potential hazard posed by an upstream water reservoir facility. |
|||||||||||||||
Hospitals, San Francisco Bay Area ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Groffie1 has evaluated seismic hazards and geologic conditions at several hospitals in the Bay area. Generally, we analyze a site using subsurface data (drilling), regional geology data, and software aids, but additional tech- niques may be used. We probabilistically develop design-level potential seismic acceleration values. Occasion- ally, special issues are involved, including potential liquefaction. At one site, we evaluated the presence of low-density sand and a nearby lagoon. Another site received our analysis of a special issue: the level of shak- ing the buildings experienced during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, centered in Santa Cruz County. |
|||||||||||||||
Los Altos Hills earthquake effects study ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ The Mw=6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake of 1989 was centered on the San Andreas fault in the Santa Cruz mountains. Urbanized areas of Santa Cruz, Watsonville, San Francisco, and Oakland were especially hard hit in terms of structural damage and deaths. Although the fault rupture itself didn’t extend up to the ground surface, curious ground extensions and shortenings and much building damage were observed in Los Altos Hills and nearby areas. The County of Santa Clara commissioned us to study the pattern of residential damage and ground effects in the unincorporated area of county near Los Altos Hills. Frank Groffie2 pre- pared a report summarizing the effects on buildings and documenting cracking in roadways and freeway structures. Groffie developed possible explanations for the concentrated seismic effects, including focusing of seismic energy from depth up to the ground surface through and between the local fault zones (Berrocal and Monte Vista-Shannon), topographic effects, and possible minor transient movement on weak discontinuities. Recommendations were adopted for rebuilding residences on the most-affected building sites and for future construction in fault zones. |
|||||||||||||||
1. While engaged to corporate firms, client legal relationships with those firms, some since absorbed into other corporate entities. Relevant technical documents on file with applicable public agencies. 2. As employee of Terratech Inc., client legal relationship with that firm, since absorbed into other corporate entities. Report may be available for viewing or purchase by the public at Santa Clara County Department of Planning and Development. |
|||||||||||||||
|